The HANNO (BORNE) STONE
is an artifact showing that the Pan North Antlantic culture of Sea People was still viable in historic times.
.
DISCUSSION:Do you think the Bourne Stone had marks punched into it by:
.
1) Hannibal's relatives,
.2) LENAPE, or
.3) an English agent, who wanted to fool historians?
.4) an English boy who wanted to fool teachers?
.VANG:
”1) Hannibal's relatives,
.“The Runic alphabet on the Bourne stone is very similar with the Glozel Alphabet.
.“The Glozel Runic is found in Glozel in a site indentified as Gallo-Roman and dating to between about A.D. 100-400 and are similar to symbols of the Harappa culture.
.“I think it is earlier then the Vikings.
.Myron: “Yes, I think so, also.
“But my point is: No, matter if the marks were punched into stone by Hannibal’s relatives, or Lenape, someone invested thoughts and effort to leave a “page” of knowledge behind.
.“The 17th century Englishmen wanted people to believe that North America was a PRISTINE wilderness.
.
They tried to convince
academic people and public media to believe that a boy scratched the marks to play a trick on a teacher.
.
“Because in the minds of people, who have had the solid evidence overwhelmed by the paadigm of the PRISTINE WILDERNESS MYTH, the stone is controversial and therefore not something to be published in the school kid's text books.
.Do you understand what is happening? We grew up thinking that there were NO rune stones in North America. [There are over 44. Most of them are decipherable--if the language is Old Norse.]
.Yet academic people can always find something to argue about. So 44 rune stones are "controversial." Publishers do not want to sell History books with controversial stuff inside. [Their primary goal is to make a profit by selling non-controversial text books.
.“This very effective means of censorship has worked almost flawlessly for four centuries.
.“Millions of School kids do N0T know what the marks on the Bourne stone look like. All they can learn from their leading authority, the teacher, is that North America was a PRISTINE wilderness.
.So the kids are hung with an incorrect paradigm they will carry in their heads for the rest of their lives.
. That paradigm implies that NEITHER Hannibal’s relatives or Lenape were in North America before the English invaded because—well—the kids did NOT see any pictures of evidence--did they?
.
1) Hannibal's relatives,
.2) LENAPE, or
.3) an English agent, who wanted to fool historians?
.4) an English boy who wanted to fool teachers?
.VANG:
”1) Hannibal's relatives,
.“The Runic alphabet on the Bourne stone is very similar with the Glozel Alphabet.
.“The Glozel Runic is found in Glozel in a site indentified as Gallo-Roman and dating to between about A.D. 100-400 and are similar to symbols of the Harappa culture.
.“I think it is earlier then the Vikings.
.Myron: “Yes, I think so, also.
“But my point is: No, matter if the marks were punched into stone by Hannibal’s relatives, or Lenape, someone invested thoughts and effort to leave a “page” of knowledge behind.
.“The 17th century Englishmen wanted people to believe that North America was a PRISTINE wilderness.
.
They tried to convince
academic people and public media to believe that a boy scratched the marks to play a trick on a teacher.
.
“Because in the minds of people, who have had the solid evidence overwhelmed by the paadigm of the PRISTINE WILDERNESS MYTH, the stone is controversial and therefore not something to be published in the school kid's text books.
.Do you understand what is happening? We grew up thinking that there were NO rune stones in North America. [There are over 44. Most of them are decipherable--if the language is Old Norse.]
.Yet academic people can always find something to argue about. So 44 rune stones are "controversial." Publishers do not want to sell History books with controversial stuff inside. [Their primary goal is to make a profit by selling non-controversial text books.
.“This very effective means of censorship has worked almost flawlessly for four centuries.
.“Millions of School kids do N0T know what the marks on the Bourne stone look like. All they can learn from their leading authority, the teacher, is that North America was a PRISTINE wilderness.
.So the kids are hung with an incorrect paradigm they will carry in their heads for the rest of their lives.
. That paradigm implies that NEITHER Hannibal’s relatives or Lenape were in North America before the English invaded because—well—the kids did NOT see any pictures of evidence--did they?
No comments:
Post a Comment